Símbolo Fondo Science

Contacte para más información en el teléfono +34 629 829 605

Revista Española de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular

Asociación Española de Artroscopia (AEA)

Header Vol. 28. Issue 3. No. 73. Sept 2021
ISSN online: 2443-9754 (es)
ISSN impreso: 2386-3129 (es)
Vol. 28. Issue 3. No. 73. September 2021
10.24129/j.reacae.28373.fs2101002
Recibido: 15 January 2021
Aceptado: 12 April 2021
Clinical case

Simultaneous but different damage to both posterior meniscus roots with multiple ligament injury of the knee following high-energy trauma. Presentation of a case

Lesión simultánea pero diferente de ambas raíces meniscales posteriores con lesión multiligamentosa de rodilla tras traumatismo de alta energía. Presentación de un caso

Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2021;28(3):214-18

Resumen: 

Se presenta un caso de lesión de ambas raíces meniscales posteriores, interna y externa, de manera simultánea tras traumatismo, con lesión asociada del pivote central en forma de rotura completa del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) y rotura parcial del ligamento cruzado posterior (LCP) con afectación parcial de ambos ligamentos colaterales. Las lesiones fueron tratadas artroscópicamente mediante técnica indirecta para la avulsión del cuerno posterior del menisco interno con fijación del fragmento óseo, sutura para la raíz del cuerno posterior del menisco externo afectada por rotura radial, reconstrucción del LCA con aloinjerto tendinoso y tratamiento conservador con ortesis de las lesiones parciales de los ligamentos colaterales medial, lateral y del LCP. Una avulsión ósea de la raíz del menisco es una variante poco frecuente de este grupo de lesiones meniscales que conforman una parte de la patología de la articulación de la rodilla cada vez más reconocida por su gravedad.

Abstract: 

The present study describes a case of simultaneous damage to both posterior meniscus roots (internal and external) secondary to trauma, with associated injury to the central pivot in the form of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and partial rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with partial involvement of both collateral ligaments. The lesions were subjected to arthroscopic treatment via an indirect technique for avulsion of the posterior horn of the internal meniscus, with fixation of the bone fragment, suturing of the root of the posterior horn of the external meniscus presenting radial rupture, ACL reconstruction with tendon allograft and conservative orthosis management of the partial lesions of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments and of the PCL. Bone avulsion of the root of the meniscus is an infrequent variant of this group of meniscal injuries that represent a part of knee joint disease, and is increasingly acknowledged due to its severity.

Introduction

The meniscal roots are essential for preventing meniscal extrusion and for transforming axial loading into circumferential loading at intraarticular level within the knee(1,2,3). Root tearing is defined as avulsion damage to the meniscotibial ligament (ligament of the root) on the tibial plateau or as radial tearing of the meniscus within the first centimetre of its insertion in the bone(4,5). This type of meniscal damage most often affects the posterior roots(3). Tearing of the external posterior root is usually caused by trauma and is seen in 7-12% of all patients with tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)(6). Lesions of the internal posterior root are mainly a consequence of chronic meniscal degenerative processes in middle aged and typically female individuals, representing up to 10-28% of the lesions subjected to arthroscopic surgery. In this regard, trauma induced damage to the internal roots is less frequent, though it has been reported in patients with multiple ligament lesions(6).

The most widely accepted classification of the different types of lesions is that proposed by LaPrade, which divides rupture injuries into 5 types according to their morphological characteristics(7), and moreover specifies the frequency of each of them:

  • Type 1 (7%): partial and stable rupture of the posterior root.
  • Type 2 (67%): complete radial rupture in the 9 mm proximal to the bone insertion. Type 2A (38%): at less than 3 mm; type 2B (16.9%): between 3 and < 6 mm; type 2C (12.7%): 6-9 mm.
  • Type 3 (6%): bucket handle meniscus rupture with complete deinsertion of the meniscal root.
  • Type 4 (10%): longitudinal or complete oblique rupture with complete deinsertion of the meniscal root.
  • Type 5 (10%): bone avulsion of the insertion of the meniscal root.

Bone avulsion of the root in the internal meniscus (type 5) is very rare(2,3,5). Our review of the literature only revealed a single reported case of simultaneous traumatic injury of both posterior roots(8), without involvement of the ligaments.

Clinical case

We present the case of a 30-year-old male seen in the emergency room of our hospital as a consequence of a motorcycle accident. Initial clinical evaluation revealed important hemarthrosis of the knee, with pain in response to palpation of the medial joint line and of the external tibial plateau, with limitation of joint balance control. The stability tests were masked by the pain; however, the posterior drawer test proved negative, while the Lachman test was positive. The collateral ligaments presented stability without laxity. Vascular or neurological damage was discarded by the sensory-motor exploration and the palpation of distal pulses.

The plain radiographs revealed bone avulsions of the posterior part of the tibia (Figure 1).

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure1.png


Figure 1. Lateral radiographic view of the knee, showing bone involvement in the posterior part of the tibia.

The computed tomography (CT) study evidenced a fracture of the posterior region of the internal tibial plateau with millimetric collapse and sub-centimetre avulsed fragments located immediately medial to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), together with a small fracture in the posterior cortical layer of the external tibial plateau without collapse, displacement or comminution (Figure 2).

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure2.png


Figure 2. The axial (A), sagittal (B) and coronal (C) computed tomography views show the avulsed bone fragments dependent upon the posterior root of the medial meniscus, near the insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple contusion edema zones with severe partial rupture of the ACL and grade I-II lesion of the PCL, with normal insertion at distal level (Figure 3A). In addition, proximal distension of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) was observed, together with damage to the external meniscus posterior root (LaPrade type 4) (Figure 3B) associated to fracture of the external tibial plateau and deinsertion of the internal meniscus posterior root (LaPrade type 5) (Figure 3B) with meniscal extrusion (Figure 3C).

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure3.png


Figure 3. Magnetic resonance imaging study showing post-contusion edema of the tibia, with rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. The posterior cruciate ligament appears correctly inserted in the sagittal view (A); the coronal view shows a radial lesion of the external meniscal root and bone avulsion with a bone fragment of the external root (B), causing extrusion of the internal meniscus (C).

Results

Following the complementary tests, the patient was diagnosed with a complex meniscal and multiple ligament injury, and surgery was recommended. The latter was carried out after 7 days of admission, due to the need for medical optimization after the initial polytraumatism involving important chest and scapular contusion.

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure4.png


Figure 4. Arthroscopy views from the anterolateral portal, showing bone avulsion with a fragment of the medial root (A), suture advancement through the meniscal root (B), and bone avulsion reduced in its bone bed (C).

Arthroscopy confirmed the diagnosis by visualizing the avulsed root and bone fragment at medial level (Figure 4A) and the radial lesion of the external root (Figure 5). Palpation of both roots evidenced clear instability. The ACL was greatly affected, with subtotal rupture, while the PCL presented correct stability in response to palpation and testing.

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure5.png


Figure 5. Arthroscopic view from the anterolateral portal, identifying the radial lesion of the root of the external meniscus.

The medial root avulsion fracture was repaired using a standard transtibial pullout technique(1,3,6). Suturing required the use of no. 2 FiberWire® (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA ) through the root with the Knee Scorpion™ system (Arthrex, Naples, FL,  USA) (Figure 4B). A FlipCutter® III retrograde reamer (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA)  with a Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide (Arthrex, Naples, FL,  USA) was used to drill a blind tibial tunnel, 6 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length, from the bone bed of the medial meniscus towards the anteromedial tibial cortical layer. The meniscus sutures were retrieved through the trans-bone tunnel with a FiberStick® (Arthex, Naples, FL,  USA). The suture was knotted through a metal button, securing correct reduction of the meniscal avulsion (Figure 4C).

The rupture of the lateral meniscal root was repaired with two U-shaped meniscal sutures using a Knee Scorpion™ suture passer. Lastly, reconstruction of the ACL was carried out with an anterior tibial tendon allograft with proximal and distal cortical suspension fixation according to the all-inside technique, avoiding the coalition of tunnels at tibial medial level. 

With regard to postoperative rehabilitation, a postsurgery knee pad was used with varus/valgus control and without posterior drawer control, since the operated ACL injury was considered to be more relevant than the PCL lesion. The pad was removed 8 weeks after surgery. The avoidance of weight bearing of the affected leg was included during four weeks to avoid meniscus tension, followed by partial weight bearing for another four weeks. Flexion of the knee controlled with the orthosis was restricted to 30º during the first two weeks, followed by a gradual increase to 60º and 90º after two and four weeks, respectively, to protect the meniscal repairs in relation to both the medial avulsion and the lateral suture(8).

reacae.28373.fs2101002-figure6.png


Figure 6. Magnetic resonance imaging views showing correct positioning of both menisci, without evidence of meniscus extrusion (A); consolidation of the bone fragment of the reinserted medial root (B); and intact and correctly positioned anterior cruciate ligament plasty (C).

Four months after the operation, control MRI revealed correct positioning of both menisci, with no evidence of meniscus extrusion (Figure 6A), and with consolidation of the reinserted fragment (Figure 6B). The ACL plasty was seen to be intact and correctly positioned (Figure 6C). At physical examination, the joint balance of the knee comprised a 5º defect for complete extension, with a passive flexion range of 120º and an active range of 100º, with correct anteroposterior and mediolateral stability.

Discussion

The meniscal roots are the only part of the meniscus inserted in bone, and damage to them is likely to have a strong negative effect upon the biomechanics of the knee. As a result, in recent years, the main reference groups have placed emphasis on the importance of the diagnosis and treatment of these lesions(3,9).

Root tears are commonly soft tissue lesions involving either the ligament of the root or the posterior meniscal horn(2,10,11). Root avulsion fractures are rare lesions with few literature references(12). Although such avulsions can be evidenced by MRI, it is also advisable to obtain radiographs and conduct a CT study for improved visualization of the avulsed bone fragment, in addition to the routine resonance imaging study made when meniscus and ligament injuries are suspected. The characteristics of our patient (a young male with severe trauma) are consistent with those described in the literature(11). Surgeons should exercise a strong degree of suspicion in patients of this kind, particularly if the radiographic study evidences a bone fragment near the insertion of the meniscal root(12). High energy mechanisms may associate damage to the lateral or central pivot ligaments, particularly the ACL. At the time of rupture of this ligament, the lateral femoral condyle may subsequently suffer subluxation over the tibia, exerting great tension in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus(4), causing the lesion. Tears of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus have been identified in up to 7-12% of all patients with ACL injuries(2,4,5); for this reason, it is important to always discard their presence in young patients with high energy knee injuries. In a study in cadavers, Markolf(13) showed anterior tibial force and external tibial torsion to be loading modes that generate great forces in the posterior medial root, presumably through trapping of the medial femoral condyle against the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Elimination of the ACL even increases the force acting upon the posterior medial root(13). This study may explain the mechanism underlying the medial lesion observed in our patient.

There is broad agreement in the literature that root tear fixation is the treatment of choice for preserving the biomechanical function of the meniscus(1,10,14). Since root avulsion fractures probably exert the same harmful effect upon the biomechanics of the knee joint as root injuries without bone involvement, we believe that fixation always should be indicated if possible in both lesion patterns. Direct fixation systems have been described for avulsions, involving the placement of sutures through the bone fragment; alternatively, indirect fixation can be performed, positioning the sutures adjacent to the fragment (2,5,12,14). It is very advisable for these fixation systems to be routinely available for use in the different root injuries in arthroscopic ligament repair surgeries, for as commented above, it is not unusual to find this combination of lesions even unexpectedly(2,4,5). Indirect fixation was carried out in our patient, since the fragment was small, and we sought to avoid its fracture during the manoeuvre.

Since ACL insufficiency is associated to failed meniscal repair(14), reconstruction of the ACL is indicated in these cases(3,6,11), based on autologous or heterologous grafts - this being the system used in our case in order not to increase morbidity of the soft tissues around the knee.

Figuras

Figure 1. Lateral radiographic view of the knee, showing bone involvement in the posterior part of the tibia.

Figure 2. The axial (A), sagittal (B) and coronal (C) computed tomography views show the avulsed bone fragments dependent upon the posterior root of the medial meniscus, near the insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Figure 3. Magnetic resonance imaging study showing post-contusion edema of the tibia, with rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. The posterior cruciate ligament appears correctly inserted in the sagittal view (A); the coronal view shows a radial lesion of the external meniscal root and bone avulsion with a bone fragment of the external root (B), causing extrusion of the internal meniscus (C).

Figure 4. Arthroscopy views from the anterolateral portal, showing bone avulsion with a fragment of the medial root (A), suture advancement through the meniscal root (B), and bone avulsion reduced in its bone bed (C).

Figure 5. Arthroscopic view from the anterolateral portal, identifying the radial lesion of the root of the external meniscus.

Figure 6. Magnetic resonance imaging views showing correct positioning of both menisci, without evidence of meniscus extrusion (A); consolidation of the bone fragment of the reinserted medial root (B); and intact and correctly positioned anterior cruciate ligament plasty (C).

Cita bibliográfica

Aguilar M, Blasco F, Minguell J, Reverté Vinaixa MM, Pijoan J, Casaccia M, Joshi N, Castellet Feliu ESimultaneous but different damage to both posterior meniscus roots with multiple ligament injury of the knee following high-energy trauma. Presentation of a case. Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2021;28(3):214-18. doi: 10.24129/j.reacae.28373.fs2101002

Ethical responsibilities

Conflicts of interest. The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial support. This study has received no financial support.

Protection of people and animals. The authors declare that this research has not involved experiments in humans or in animals.

Data confidentiality. The authors declare that the protocols of their centre referred to the publication of patient information have been followed.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1
    Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1922-31.
  • 2
    Marzo JM, Gurske-DePerio J. Effects of medial meniscus posterior horn avulsion and repair on tibiofemoral contact area and peak contact pressure with clinical implications. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):124-9.
  • 3
    Schillhammer CK, Werner FW, Scuderi MG, Cannizzaro JP. Repair of lateral meniscus posterior horn detachment lesions: a biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(11):2604-9.
  • 4
    Vyas D, Harner CD. Meniscus root repair. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2012 Jun;20(2):86-94.
  • 5
    Ahn JH, Lee YS, Chang JY, Chang MJ, Eun SS, Kim SM. Arthroscopic all inside repair of the lateral meniscus root tear. Knee. 2009 Jan;16(1):77-80.
  • 6
    West RV, Kim JG, Armfield D, Harner CD. Lateral meniscal root tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: classification and management. Arthroscopy. 2004 May;20(Suppl. 1):e32-e33.
  • 7
    LaPrade CM, James EW, Cram TR, Feagin JA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Meniscal Root Tears: A Classification System Based on Tear Morphology. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):363-9.
  • 8
    Mueller BT, Moulton SG, O'Brien L, LaPrade RF. Rehabilitation Following Meniscal Root Repair: A Clinical Commentary. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;46(2):104-13.
  • 9
    Chahla J, LaPrade RF. Meniscal Root Tears. Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1304-5.
  • 10
    Marzo JM. Meniscus root avulsion. Clin Sports Med. 2012 Jan;31(1):101-11.
  • 11
    Espejo A, Sevillano E, Espejo MJ, Lombardo M, Espejo A. Reinserción simultánea de raíz posterior de menisco externo y anterior del interno con plastia de ligamento cruzado anterior asociada. Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2016;23:112-7.
  • 12
    Feucht MJ, Salzmann GM, Pestka JM, Südkamp NP, Niemeyer P. Simultaneous avulsion fracture of the posterior medial and posterior lateral meniscus root: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Apr;134(4):509-14.
  • 13
    Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Force measurements in the medial meniscus posterior horn attachment: effects of anterior cruciate ligament removal. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):332-8.
  • 14
    Johannsen AM, Civitarese DM, Padalecki JR, Goldsmith MT, Wijdicks CA, Laprade RF. Qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis of the posterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2342-7.

Descargar artículo: 

Icono PDF reacae.28373.fs2101002-simultaneous-but-different-damage.pdf

Licencia: 

Este contenido es de acceso abierto (Open-Access) y se ha distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional) que permite usar, distribuir y reproducir en cualquier medio siempre que se citen a los autores y no se utilice para fines comerciales ni para hacer obras derivadas.

Comparte este contenido

En esta edición

Licencia de Creative Commons
Revista Española de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular está distribuida bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.