Símbolo Fondo Science

Contacte para más información en el teléfono +34 629 829 605

Revista Española de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular

Asociación Española de Artroscopia (AEA)

Header Vol. 28. Issue 4. No. 74. December 2021
ISSN online: 2443-9754 (es)
ISSN impreso: 2386-3129 (es)
Vol. 28. Issue 4. No. 74. December 2021
10.24129/j.reacae.28474.fs2103010
Recibido: 7 March 2021
Aceptado: 23 August 2021
Surgical Technique

Stabilization of os acromiale with cannulated screws and high-resistance sutures

Estabilización de os acromiale con tornillos canulados y suturas de alta resistencia

Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2021;28(4):259-65

Resumen: 

El os acromiale se define como la ausencia de unión de cualquiera de los centros de osificación acromial primario con el acromion basal. Los pacientes suelen presentar síntomas inespecíficos como dolor, generalmente nocturno, dificultad para realizar actividades por encima de los 90° de abducción y debilidad.

La primera línea de tratamiento debe ser no quirúrgica, mediante la administración de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos o infiltraciones locales con corticosteroides. Sin embargo, en un gran número de casos se precisa tratamiento quirúrgico por la elevada refractariedad al tratamiento conservador.

Gran variedad de técnicas se han descrito, sin existir consenso sobre cuál es la mejor opción para la fijación del os acromiale inestable sintomático de tipo mesoacromion.

El objetivo de esta nota técnica es describir nuestra opción quirúrgica de preferencia para estos casos, mediante la utilización de tornillos canulados reforzados con una banda de tensión de sutura de alta resistencia dispuesta en una configuración en “8” sin el agregado de injerto óseo, utilizando un abordaje transacromial, de medial a lateral, con mínima desinserción del deltoides. Así también, enumerar ventajas y limitaciones del procedimiento, y nombrar los puntos clave que se deben tener en cuenta en el momento de llevarlo a cabo.

Abstract: 

Os acromiale is defined as the absence of fusion of any of the primary acromial ossification centres with the basal acromion. Affected patients usually present nonspecific symptoms such as pain (generally nocturnal), difficulty performing activities involving abduction above 90°, and weakness.

First line treatment should not consist of surgery; instead, the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or local corticosteroid infiltrations are indicated. Nevertheless, surgery often proves necessary due to high refractoriness to conservative management.

Many surgical techniques have been described, though agreement is lacking as to which option is best for the fixation of mesoacromion type unstable symptomatic os acromiale.

The present technical note describes our preferred surgical approach for such cases, based on the use of cannulated screws reinforced by a high-resistance suture tension band distributed in an "8" pattern, without added bone grafting and employing a transacromial medial to lateral surgical approach with minimum disinsertion of the deltoid muscle. The advantages and limitations of the procedure are also described, and the key aspects to be taken into account when performing the technique are commented.

Introduction

The acromion originates from four separate ossification centres: the preacromion, the mesoacromion, the meta-acromion and the basiacromion, from anterior to posterior. Their fusion occurs between 18 and 25 years of age(1). The os acromiale is defined as the absence of fusion of any of the primary acromial ossification centres with the basal acromion (basiacromion)(2). It can be classified into three types according to the non-ossified segment located immediately anterior to the absence of fusion (preacromion, mesoacromion and meta-acromion), with mesoacromion being the most frequent presentation(3). The incidence of the condition is 1-15% in radiographic and anatomical studies(4). Affected patients usually present nonspecific symptoms. The manifestations may include pain (generally nocturnal), difficulty performing activities involving abduction above 90º, and weakness(5). It is important to establish a differential diagnosis and rule out other pain-causing disorders such as rotator cuff rupture, SLAP (Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior) lesions or arthritic changes of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint(5).

Anterior acromial mobility, assessed through local palpation, is a clinical finding strongly suggestive of symptomatic os acromiale, and which in some cases may predispose to tendon rupture of the supra- or infraspinatus muscle(6,7).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure1.png


Figure 1. Left shoulder. Preoperative radiographic view showing a "double density" sign (red circle) suggestive of os acromiale.

The basic imaging diagnostic explorations should include anteroposterior, axillary and scapular Y projection radiographs(Figure 1), with the axillary view being the most useful option in this regard(8). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify additional disease conditions such as concomitant rotator cuff injury, for example(9). The presence of bone oedema in axial sections in fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences is an expected sign in the MRI assessment of symptomatic os acromiale (Figure 2).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure2.png


Figure 2. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic views showing deformation of the distal extremity of the acromion with the presence of an acromial ossicle of irregular morphology (images A, D and F, red circle) associated to incipient supraspinatus tendinopathy, with enhanced signal intensity of the tendon in the bursal surface (images B and C, yellow arrow).

First line treatment should be non-surgical in all cases, based on the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or local corticosteroid infiltrations during a maximum period of 6 months(10). Nevertheless, surgery often proves necessary due to high refractoriness to conservative management(11,12).

A great variety of surgical techniques are available, with variable results(13,14,15,16,17,18).

The present technical note describes our preferred surgical procedure for mesoacromion type symptomatic os acromiale treatment.

Surgical technique (Tables 1-3)

Under general anaesthesia and interscalene locoregional block, the patient is placed in deck chair position (Figure 3). Under conditions of asepsis and antisepsis, the surgical field is delimited and the anatomical references are marked (os acromiale, acromion, clavicle, AC joint and coracoid process), with planned incision (Figure 3).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-table1.png


Table 1. Step-by-step surgical technique. Stabilization of os acromiale with cannulated screws and high-resistance sutures

An italic "S" skin incision of approximately 8 cm is made from the middle third of the clavicle to the posterolateral margin of the acromion, reaching the acromial periosteum (Figure 3).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure3.png


Figure 3. Left shoulder. Patient in deck chair position. Lateral view. Italic "S" skin incision from the distal clavicle to the posterolateral margin of the acromion.

Mobility of the acromion is assessed by applying vertical pressure along its length. Once the non-fusion site of the os acromiale has been identified, the periosteum is dissected along the full length of the acromion and is retracted from anterior to posterior, exposing the margins of the non-fusion zone and allowing correct coverage at the end of the operation (Figure 4). The elevator is positioned between the os acromiale and the acromion to improve its exposure.

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-table2.png


Table 2. Advantages and limitations

Full disinsertion of the deltoid muscle from the anterior margin of the acromion is not advised, in order to avoid damaging the terminal branches of the thoracoacromial artery.

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure4.png


Figure 4. Non-fusion site of os acromiale; dissect the periosteum over the full length of the acromion, and retract from anterior to posterior.

If needed, release of the anterior deltoid should be the minimum required to allow manipulation of the mesoacromion and implant the osteosynthesis material.

The pseudoarthrosis surface may be eliminated using rongeur type forceps, motorized drills or an oscillating saw (Figure 5). If a saw or drill is chosen, it is advisable to use a soft tissue protector with the aim of avoiding unintentional damage to the supraspinatus tendon (Figure 6). In order to favour consolidation of the mesoacromion, it is advisable to perforate orifices to allow increased local bleeding using a 1.2 mm drill. 

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure5.png


Figure 5. Left shoulder. Patient in deck chair position. Lateral view. The pseudoarthrosis surface may be eliminated using rongeur type forceps.

Following removal of the pseudoarthrosis, and after exposing the margins of the os acromiale, fixation is carried out. The os acromiale is reduced to its anatomical position and is provisionally kept fixed with reduction forceps. After confirming anatomical reduction, provisional stabilization is achieved with two parallel Kirschner wires (K-wires), perforating from the anterior margin of the exposed os acromiale to emerge from the posterior surface of the basiacromion, making sure that the K-wire is directed parallel to the acromial bone without invading the subacromial space.

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure6.png


Figure 6. If an oscillating saw is chosen to eliminate pseudoarthrosis, use a soft tissue protector with the aim of avoiding unintentional damage to the supraspinatus tendon.

At this point we determine the length of the screws needed for fixation, with the help of an additional K-wire to measure, or by superimposing the screw over the acromion (Figure 7).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure7.png


Figure 7. Stabilization by using two parallel Kirschner wires, perforating from the anterior margin of the exposed os acromiale to emerge from the posterior surface of the basiacromion. Determine the length of the screws needed for fixation by superimposing the screw over the acromion.

With a 2.4 mm cannulated drill, we drill through the previously used two K-wires, and two partially threaded 3.0 mm HPS® screws (MedcomTech) are implanted from anterior to posterior in order to ensure the maximum compression possible.

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure8.png


Figure 8. Once the cannulated screws have been positioned, the Kirschner wires are removed and a second fixation is applied using high-resistance suture. Passing of the suture is done with a flexible looped wire as transport.

Once the cannulated screws have been positioned, the K-wires are removed and we apply a second fixation based on the tension band principle, using a high-resistance suture Hi-Fi® no. 5 (ConMed, FL, USA),  tunnelled through the cannulated screws. Passing of the suture makes use of a flexible looped wire as transport mechanism (Figure 8).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure9.png


Figure 9. Final "8" pattern configuration, which is knotted and manually adjusted until no loss of tension is noted.

An "8" pattern is preferred, tightened with a sliding knot, manual tension and posterior 8-knot reinforcement, until no loss of tension is observed. This is a modification of the classical technique (19) based on the tension band principle with a 1-mm metal wire in a similar shroud knot pattern (Figure 9). The use of non-metal high-resistance sutures avoids possible complications such as intolerance of the osteosynthesis material, which could require further surgery for removal. Radioscopic control is carried out at the end of the procedure (Figure 10).

reacae.28474.fs2103010en-figure10.png


Figure 10. Control at the end of the procedure. Posteroanterior and axillary view of the left shoulder.

The periosteum is reinserted, securing full coverage of the construct. If disinsertion of part of the deltoid muscle is proved necessary, it is reinserted using transosseous sutures. The subcutaneous layer is then tightly sealed in place. For closing of the skin, intradermal suture with resorbable material is to be preferred.

Postoperative period

The patient is immobilized with a sling for two weeks. Passive joint balancing and pendular exercises are allowed from the immediate postoperative period and during the first four weeks. From week four, active mobilization can begin, together with strengthening exercises and activities of daily living. The return to sports activities is allowed after 6-8 weeks.

Discussion

There is no agreement as to which is the best option for the fixation of mesoacromion type unstable symptomatic os acromiale. Our preferred treatment strategy in such cases is the use of cannulated screws reinforced by a high-resistance suture tension band distributed in an "8" pattern, without added bone grafting and employing a transacromial medial to lateral surgical approach with minimum disinsertion of the deltoid muscle from the anterior margin of the acromion.

A number of techniques have been described for those cases in which conservative management fails: open or arthroscopic excision, acromioplasty or subacromial decompression, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Wright et al.(16) reported good outcomes with subacromial decompression in 13 patients after one year of follow-up. Campbell et al.(17) in turn performed arthroscopic excision of os acromiale in 31 shoulders. Complete pain relief was achieved in 20 of the shoulders, with improvement in 9. However, the appearance of deltoid dysfunction on resecting large fragments remains a cause of concern.

If ORIF of the symptomatic mesoacromion is decided to be performed, a number of options are available(11,18). The best results were recorded with the use of K-wires or compression cannulated screws, usually combined with a tension band (metallic in most cases)(20,21,22).

In a descriptive series of 15 cases of os acromiale published by Warner et al.(20), the patients were subjected to three surgical techniques: pre- and mesoacromion exeresis; ORIF with K-wire and cerclage; and ORIF with cannulated screws, cerclage and iliac crest autologous bone grafting. The best clinical outcomes were obtained with the consolidation of os acromiale and exeresis of the preacromion - the consolidation index being greater in the group subjected to osteosynthesis with screws, cerclage and grafting.

Similar results were reported by Peckett et al.(21), achieving consolidation of os acromiale within an average of four months in 25 out of 26 patients (96%) treated with tension bands and K-wires or cannulated screws. In the same way as the previous authors, Boehm et al.(22) recorded successful outcomes in 15 out of 22 patients (68%) subjected to fusion of os acromiale with isolated tension bands over a mean follow-up of 41 months.

A factor that may also favour successful ORIF is the use of autologous bone grafts(20,23), though this does not seem mandatory for achieving correct consolidation, provided stable fixation with acceptable compression is secured, as evidenced by the results published by Atoun et al.(13). These authors recorded radiographic consolidation in 6 out of 8 patients treated via arthroscopy with resorbable cannulated screws.

The vascularization of the unstable fragment would also play an important role in defining the outcome of osteosynthesis. It is believed that preserving the insertion of the deltoid muscle anterior to the os acromiale fragment (as recommended in the description of our surgical technique) would help preserve the acromial branch of the thoracoacromial artery. This, associated to fixation with cannulated screws and a tension band, appears to increase the percentage of consolidation. In this regard, Hertel et al.(19) documented a variable mesoacromion consolidation rate that appeared to depend on the surgical approach used. Fusion occurred in 43% of their patients subjected to a trans-deltoid approach versus in 88% of the cases when a transacromial approach was used.

A significant problem is the high incidence of intolerance and extraction of the implanted material following ORIF - a circumstance that may lessen the favourable opinion of the patient regarding the outcome of surgery. These figures are much higher with the combination of K-wires and cerclage than when using the cannulated screw and tension band technique, as reported by Warner et al., Hertel et al. and Peckett et al., with percentages of between 86-100%(15,19,20).

This high implant intolerance rate reflects the potential advantage of a fixation method with a lower profile, such as the combination of a tension band using high-resistance sutures together with cannulated screws(14,24), as described in the present technical note. Such a combination would afford biomechanical resistance similar to that of stainless steel wire cerclage, according to the data published by Shui et al.(25) in a study in cadavers.

Our study shows that the fixation of symptomatic os acromiale using cannulated screws and tension bands with high-resistance sutures allows consolidation of the mesoacromion without the need for secondary procedures (material ablation), and without complications.

The optimum results recorded define this surgical technique as a reproducible alternative to be taken into account in infrequent cases of symptomatic os acromiale.

Figuras

Figure 1. Left shoulder. Preoperative radiographic view showing a "double density" sign (red circle) suggestive of os acromiale.

Figure 2. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic views showing deformation of the distal extremity of the acromion with the presence of an acromial ossicle of irregular morphology (images A, D and F, red circle) associated to incipient supraspinatus tendinopathy, with enhanced signal intensity of the tendon in the bursal surface (images B and C, yellow arrow).

Figure 3. Left shoulder. Patient in deck chair position. Lateral view. Italic "S" skin incision from the distal clavicle to the posterolateral margin of the acromion.

Figure 4. Non-fusion site of os acromiale; dissect the periosteum over the full length of the acromion, and retract from anterior to posterior.

Figure 5. Left shoulder. Patient in deck chair position. Lateral view. The pseudoarthrosis surface may be eliminated using rongeur type forceps.

Figure 6. If an oscillating saw is chosen to eliminate pseudoarthrosis, use a soft tissue protector with the aim of avoiding unintentional damage to the supraspinatus tendon.

Figure 7. Stabilization by using two parallel Kirschner wires, perforating from the anterior margin of the exposed os acromiale to emerge from the posterior surface of the basiacromion. Determine the length of the screws needed for fixation by superimposing the screw over the acromion.

Figure 8. Once the cannulated screws have been positioned, the Kirschner wires are removed and a second fixation is applied using high-resistance suture. Passing of the suture is done with a flexible looped wire as transport.

Figure 9. Final "8" pattern configuration, which is knotted and manually adjusted until no loss of tension is noted.

Figure 10. Control at the end of the procedure. Posteroanterior and axillary view of the left shoulder.

Tablas

Table 1. Step-by-step surgical technique. Stabilization of os acromiale with cannulated screws and high-resistance sutures

Table 2. Advantages and limitations

Table 3. Key points

Cita bibliográfica

Ibañez Malvestiti M, Comas Aguilar M, Mendez Sanchez G, Mir Bullo J, Marlet Naranjo V, Marlet Jordana MTStabilization of <em>os acromiale</em> with cannulated screws and high-resistance sutures. Rev Esp Artrosc Cir Articul. 2021;28(4):259-65. doi: 10.24129/j.reacae.28474.fs2103010

Ethical responsibilities

Conflicts of interest. The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial support. This study has received no financial support.

Protection of people and animals. The authors declare that this research has not involved human or animal experimentation.

Data confidentiality. The authors declare that the protocols of their centre referred to the publication of patient information have been followed.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1
    McClure JG, Raney RB. Anomalies of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;110:22-31.
  • 2
    Kurtz CA, Humble BJ, Rodosky MW, Sekiya JK. Symptomatic os acromiale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:12-9.
  • 3
    Sammarco VJ. Os acromiale: Frequency, anatomy, and clinical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:394-400.
  • 4
    Burbank KM, Lemos MJ, Bell G, Lemos DW. Incidence of os acromiale in patients with shoulder pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36:153-55.
  • 5
    Arenas-Miquélez A, Hertel R. The unstable os acromiale: a cause of pain in the young athlete. JSES Int. 2020 May 18;4(3):559-63.
  • 6
    Ouellette H, Thomas BJ, Kassarjian A, et al. Re-examining the association of os acromiale with supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Sep;36(9):835-9.
  • 7
    Mudge MK, Wood VE, Frykman GK. Rotator cuff tears associated with os acromiale. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:427-9.
  • 8
    Lee DH, Lee KH, López-Ben R, Bradley EL. The double-density sign: a radiographic finding suggestive of an os acromiale. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2666-70.
  • 9
    Rovesta C, Marongiu MC, Corradini A, Torricelli P, Ligabue G. Os acromiale: frequency and a review of 726 shoulder MRI. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017;101:201-5.
  • 10
    You T, Frostick S, Zhang WT, Yin Q. Os Acromiale: Reviews and Current Perspectives. Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):738-44.
  • 11
    Viner GC, He JK, Brabston EW, Momaya A, Ponce BA. Os acromiale: systematic review of surgical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):402-10.
  • 12
    Horton S, Smuda MP, Jauregui JJ, et al. Management of symptomatic os acromiale: a survey of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons. Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2569-78.
  • 13
    Atoun E, van Tongel A, Narvani A, Rath E, Sforza G, Levy O. Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation of the symptomatic unstable os acromiale with absorbable screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1740-5.
  • 14
    Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Jones GL. Systematic review of the surgical treatment for symptomatic os acromiale. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2011 Jan;5(1):9-16.
  • 15
    Peckett WRC, Gunther SB, Harper GD, Hughes JS, Sonnabend DH. Internal fixation of symptomatic os acromiale: a series of twenty-six cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:381-5.
  • 16
    Wright RW, Heller MA, Quick DC, Buss DD. Arthroscopic decompression for impingement syndrome secondary to an unstable os acromiale. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:595-9.
  • 17
    Campbell PT, Nizlan NM, Skirving AP. Arthroscopic excision of os acromiale: effects on deltoid function and strength. Orthopaedics. 2012;35:e1601-5.
  • 18
    Lebus GF, Fritz EM, Hussain ZB, Pogorzelski J, Millett PJ. Operative Treatment of Symptomatic Meso-Type Os Acromiale. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Jul 24;6(4):e1093-e1099.
  • 19
    Hertel R, Windisch W, Schuster A, Ballmer FT. Transacromial approach to obtain fusion of unstable os acromiale. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:606-9.
  • 20
    Warner JJ, Beim GM, Higgins L. The treatment of symptomatic os acromiale. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1320-6.
  • 21
    Peckett WR, Gunther SB, Harper GD, Hughes JS, Sonnabend DH. Internal fixation of symptomatic os acromiale: a series of twenty-six cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:381-5.
  • 22
    Boehm TD, Matzer M, Brazda D, Gohlke FE. Os acromiale associated with tear of the rotator cuff treated operatively. Review of 33 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:545-9.
  • 23
    Atinga M, Gregor R, Selvaraj KM, Hong TF. Os acromiale open reduction and internal fixation: a review of iliac crest autogenous bone grafting and local bone grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):1030-6.
  • 24
    Hasan SA, Shiu B, Jauregui JJ. Symptomatic, Unstable Os Acromiale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Nov 15;26(22):789-97.
  • 25
    Shiu B, Song X, Iacangelo A, et al. Os acromiale fixation: a biomechanical comparison of polyethylene suture versus stainless steel wire tension band. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Dec;25(12):2034-9.

Descargar artículo: 

Icono PDF reacae.28474.fs2103010-stabilization-os-acromiale-cannulated-screws.pdf

Licencia: 

Este contenido es de acceso abierto (Open-Access) y se ha distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND (Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional) que permite usar, distribuir y reproducir en cualquier medio siempre que se citen a los autores y no se utilice para fines comerciales ni para hacer obras derivadas.